FirePro M5950 vs P104 100
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P104 100 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 882 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 9108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| FirePro M5950 and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GP104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |