GeForce 825M vs P104 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 825M and P104 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 825M stacks up against P104 100, check out specs charts below.
P104 100
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 757 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8208 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 825M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 233% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 520% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK208 | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |