GeForce 920MX vs P104 100
When choosing between GeForce 920MX and P104 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920MX and P104 100.
P104 100
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 642 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8208 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 180% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than P104 100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |