GeForce GT 650M vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- GeForce GT 650M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8208 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 650M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |