GeForce GTX 660M vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 660M and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 660M will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 772 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8008 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N13E-GE | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |