GeForce GTX 850A vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 850A and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 850A will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 850A
P104 100
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 705 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 8208 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than P104 100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1000% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Code name | GM107 | GP104 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |