GeForce GTX 870M vs P104 100
When choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and P104 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 870M and P104 100.
P104 100
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 2 GB more memory, than P104 100.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 666 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and P104 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | N15P-GT | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |