Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs P104 100
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than P104 100.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 1407 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Pascal |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 40 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- P104 100 vs Radeon RX 550X
- P104 100 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 mobile
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R7 370
- P104 100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 mobile
- P104 100 vs Radeon R7 370