P104 100 vs Radeon Pro 450
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between P104 100 and Radeon Pro 450, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the P104 100 stacks up against Radeon Pro 450, check out specs charts below.
P104 100
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P104 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- P104 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 807 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 4928 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Polaris |
| Code name | GP104 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |