P104 100 vs Radeon Pro 560X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between P104 100 and Radeon Pro 560X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the P104 100 stacks up against Radeon Pro 560X, check out specs charts below.
P104 100
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P104 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P104 100 and Radeon Pro 560X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- P104 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 4928 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P104 100 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| P104 100 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Polaris |
| Code name | GP104 | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |