P104 100 vs Radeon R9 M280X
When choosing between P104 100 and Radeon R9 M280X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between P104 100 and Radeon R9 M280X.
P104 100
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P104 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M280X - in Laptops.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M280X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 707 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P104 100 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| P104 100 and Radeon R9 M280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 411% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M280X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Code name | GP104 | Saturn XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 1 February 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |