P104 100 vs Radeon R9 M370X
When choosing between P104 100 and Radeon R9 M370X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between P104 100 and Radeon R9 M370X.
P104 100
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- P104 100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- P104 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 807 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M370X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 5508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Cape Verde |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 19 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |