P104 100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between P104 100 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P104 100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- P104 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than P104 100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 1033 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- P104 100 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 6876 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP104 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |