FirePro M5950 vs P106 090
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and P106 090, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and P106 090.
P106 090
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 114% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 090 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 629 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 7108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 171% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 181% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5950 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 110% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 145% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 104% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GP106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 73.49 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |