FirePro M6100 vs P106 090
In this comparison between FirePro M6100 and P106 090 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6100 will be the best choice, for others P106 090 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 254 MHz higher, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 2008 MHz higher, than FirePro M6100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M6100 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 29% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Pascal |
| Code name | Bonaire | GP106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 73.49 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |