GeForce 820A vs P106 090
When comparing GeForce 820A and P106 090, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and P106 090 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 820A
P106 090
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 090 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 579 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6208 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GF117 | GP106 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 73.49 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 6.1 |