GeForce GT 755M vs P106 090
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 755M and P106 090. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 755M and P106 090. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P106 090
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 374 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 2608 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 755M and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | N14P- | GP106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 73.49 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2,352 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |