Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs P106 090
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Xe MAX Graphics and P106 090. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Xe MAX Graphics and P106 090. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P106 090
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe MAX Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe MAX Graphics here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | P106 090 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is build with Gen. 12 Xe architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
- Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 3742 MHz higher, than Iris Xe MAX Graphics.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Dota 2 is 27% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Fortnite is 107% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Minecraft is 18% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe MAX Graphics in World of Tanks is 4% more, than P106 090. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe MAX Graphics | P106 090 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 Xe | Pascal |
| Code name | iDG1LPDEV | GP106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 31 October 2020 | 31 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4266 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Check Price |