P106 090 vs Quadro FX 4800
In this comparison between P106 090 and Quadro FX 4800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 4800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1533 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 752 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro FX 4800 is 17 mm longer, than P106 090.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 312% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |