P106 090 vs Quadro K1000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing P106 090 and Quadro K1000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between P106 090 and Quadro K1000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P106 090
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro K1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 504 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 6208 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro K1000M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP106 | N14P-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |