P106 090 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between P106 090 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 316 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 3008 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 16% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than P106 090. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| P106 090 and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP106 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1197 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |