P106 090 vs Quadro M4000M
When comparing P106 090 and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 090 and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 090
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
P106 090 | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than P106 090.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro M4000M has 1 GB more memory, than P106 090.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 379 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 2996 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 27% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 107% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 18% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than P106 090. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than P106 090. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than P106 090. |
Full Specs
P106 090 | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 July 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1013 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |