P106 090 vs Radeon 520
When choosing between P106 090 and Radeon 520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between P106 090 and Radeon 520.
P106 090
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 090 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 324 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 5758 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 310% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | Oland |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Check Price |