P106 090 vs Radeon R7 M270
When comparing P106 090 and Radeon R7 M270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 090 and Radeon R7 M270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 090
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 529 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Code name | GP106 | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |