P106 090 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between P106 090 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Main Specs
P106 090
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than P106 090.
P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 3 GB more memory, than P106 090.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of P106 090 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
P106 090 is 2 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 4876 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
190−200
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 14% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
P106 090
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GP106
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
31 July 2017
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
1354 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
Transistor count
4,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
73.49
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,352 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
250 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
8008 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
