P106 090 vs Tesla M2070 Q

In this comparison between P106 090 and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

P106 090

Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

	P106 090	Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than P106 090.
P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla M2070 Q has 3 GB more memory, than P106 090.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of P106 090 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
P106 090 is 2 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 4876 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	24−27	9−10
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 181% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
P106 090 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	200−210	120−130
medium / 768p	170−180	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	75−80
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	60−65
medium / 1080p	50−55	18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	85−90	50−55
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	27−30	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	50−55	20−22
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.

Full Specs

	P106 090	Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	GP106	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 July 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1531 MHz
Transistor count	4,400 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	73.49	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,352 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Length	250 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s

P106 090 vs Tesla M2070 Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares