FirePro W4190M vs P106 100
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and P106 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others P106 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | P106 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 681 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 4008 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 357% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | P106 100 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Pascal |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GP106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 19 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 136.7 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |