GeForce GT 755M vs P106 100
When choosing between GeForce GT 755M and P106 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 755M and P106 100.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 140% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P106 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 526 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 2608 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N14P- | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |