GeForce GTX 480M vs P106 100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 480M and P106 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 480M will be the best choice, for others P106 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 20% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M is build with Fermi architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 656 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 6808 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 352 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.7 billion/sec | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |