GeForce GTX 670M vs P106 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and P106 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 670M stacks up against P106 100, check out specs charts below.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 908 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 6508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 336 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |