Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs P106 100
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and P106 100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and P106 100.
P106 100
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 700% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 1206 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Pascal |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- P106 100 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- P106 100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro S9000
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- P106 100 vs FirePro S9000
- P106 100 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q