P106 100 vs Quadro CX
In this comparison between P106 100 and Quadro CX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro CX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
Quadro CX
Main Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro CX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- Quadro CX has 25% more power consumption, than P106 100.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1530 GB more memory, than P106 100.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 904 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Quadro CX is 17 mm longer, than P106 100.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 6408 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P106 100 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| P106 100 and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro CX | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | GT200B |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 June 2017 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 1.3 |