P106 100 vs Quadro K3000M
When comparing P106 100 and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 100 and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
P106 100 | Quadro K3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- P106 100 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 852 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 5208 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K3000M. |
Full Specs
P106 100 | Quadro K3000M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP106 | N14E-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 19 June 2017 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 576 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 654 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 31.39 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |