P106 100 vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing P106 100 and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between P106 100 and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
P106 100
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 100 has 118% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- P106 100 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- P106 100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 468 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 3008 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P106 100 and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| P106 100 and Quadro M2000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro M2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 100 | Quadro M2000M | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Code name | GP106 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 19 June 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | 1197 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 43.92 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 5.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |