P106 100 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between P106 100 and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 100
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
P106 100 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 606 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
P106 100 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
P106 100 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Topaz |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 19 June 2017 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |