P106 100 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between P106 100 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between P106 100 and Tesla M2070 Q.
P106 100
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
| P106 100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 87% more power consumption, than P106 100.
- P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- P106 100 and Tesla M2070 Q have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 932 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- P106 100 is 2 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 4876 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 100 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP106 | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 19 June 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 250 mm | 248 mm |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |