Quadro 2000 vs Radeon E6760

In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro 2000 Radeon E6760
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 45 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Quadro 2000 has 37% more power consumption, than Radeon E6760.
  • Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
  • Quadro 2000 and Radeon E6760 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon E6760.
  • Quadro 2000 and Radeon E6760 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 1−2 2−3
ultra / 1080p 0−1 0−1
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 10−12 12−14
medium / 1080p 2−3 3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

  Quadro 2000 Radeon E6760
Architecture Fermi TeraScale 2
Code name GF106 Turks
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 24 December 2010 2 May 2011
Pipelines 192 480
Core clock speed 625 MHz 600 MHz
Transistor count 1,170 million 716 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 20.00 14.40
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops 576.0 gflops
Length 178 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s 51.2 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 11.0
Shader Model 5.1 5.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
OpenCL 1.1 1.2
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s 52 Mh/s
  Check Price