Quadro 2000 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2075.
Main Specs
Quadro 2000
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 298% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 51 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 70 mm longer, than Quadro 2000.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 532 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
10−11
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−11
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 412% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
3−4
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
3−4
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
8−9
60−65
medium / 768p
7−8
35−40
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro 2000.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF106
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 December 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
625 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
20.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
178 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
