Quadro 2000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 2000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
10−12
30−33
medium / 1080p
2−3
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 2000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
200−210
medium / 768p
85−90
170−180
ultra / 1080p
35−40
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
10−11
24−27
high / 768p
60−65
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
90−95
ultra / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
1−2
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
95−100
medium / 1080p
8−9
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
40−45
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
1−2
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
3−4
27−30
medium / 1080p
2−3
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 350% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
8−9
50−55
medium / 768p
7−8
30−35
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 460% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro 2000.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GF106
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 December 2010
15 August 2020
Pipelines
192
96
Core clock speed
625 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
20.00
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
Length
178 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price