FirePro M4000 vs Quadro 2000D
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000D, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000D.
Quadro 2000D
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 87% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000D have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 1900 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GF106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |