FirePro M5950 vs Quadro 2000D
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 2000D, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Quadro 2000D.
Quadro 2000D
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 77% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M5950 and Quadro 2000D have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro M5950 and Quadro 2000D are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| FirePro M5950 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GF106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |