FirePro M6100 vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing FirePro M6100 and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6100 and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M6100 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 475 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro M6100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M6100 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M6100 in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Bonaire | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |