FirePro S7150 vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
- FirePro S7150 has 141% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S7150 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 295 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S7150 is 63 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7150 and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tonga | GF106 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | 178 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |