FirePro W4190M vs Quadro 2000D
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 2000D
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro W4190M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro W4190M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GF106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |