GeForce 920M vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920M and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920M and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 87% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 329 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |