GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro 2000D

In this comparison between GeForce GT 645M and Quadro 2000D you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 645M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 2000D will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GT 645M Check Price

Quadro 2000D

GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:

GeForce GT 645M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GT 645M	Quadro 2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	32 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI
	Check Price

Quadro 2000D has 93% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GT 645M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	2−3
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	12−14
medium / 1080p	2−3	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
ultra / 1080p	3−4	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	14−16
medium / 1080p	4−5	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
QHD / 1440p	−	21−24
4K / 2160p	10−11	16−18
high / 768p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	70−75	65−70
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	70−75	75−80
medium / 768p	45−50	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p	2−3	2−3
ultra / 1080p	2−3	2−3
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	10−12
medium / 1080p	3−4	3−4
GeForce GT 645M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	40−45	45−50
high / 1080p	3−4	4−5
ultra / 1080p	2−3	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p	1−2	1−2
ultra / 1080p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	3−4	4−5
medium / 1080p	2−3	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
ultra / 1080p	3−4	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	4−5	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	8−9	9−10
medium / 768p	7−8	8−9
high / 1080p	3−4	4−5
ultra / 1080p	3−4	4−5
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p	70−75	70−75
medium / 768p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
high / 768p	30−33	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GT 645M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GT 645M	Quadro 2000D
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	N13P-GS	GF106
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	22 March 2012	5 October 2011
Pipelines	384	192
Core clock speed		625 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	22.7 billion/sec	20.00
Floating-point performance	544.5 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length		178 mm
Memory bus width	128bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth		41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 API	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	2.1
CUDA cores	384
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI	+
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	19 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price

GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro 2000D

GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares