GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 670M has 20% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 2000D - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 2000D are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 27 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
- GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 2000D are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 1100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro 2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 670M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Dota 2 is 35% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670M | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GS1-LP | GF106 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 598 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 33.5 billion/sec | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 803.7 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.1 |
| CUDA cores | 336 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 53 Mh/s | 31 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |