GRID K160Q vs Quadro 2000D
When comparing GRID K160Q and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro 2000D | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 62 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
- GRID K160Q has 109% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K160Q and Quadro 2000D have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 818 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 34% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 24% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K160Q | Quadro 2000D | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK107 | GF106 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |