GRID K260Q vs Quadro 2000D
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro 2000D. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro 2000D. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
Quadro 2000D
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro 2000D | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 62 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
- GRID K260Q has 262% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro 2000D | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF106 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 October 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,170 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 480.0 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |