GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro 2000D

When comparing GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Quadro 2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID M10 8Q

Quadro 2000D

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Quadro 2000D
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI

GRID M10 8Q has 262% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID M10 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 2000D - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 408 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000D - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID M10 8Q is 89 mm longer, than Quadro 2000D.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2600 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	4−5	−
low / 720p	45−50	14−16
medium / 1080p	21−24	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	190−200	120−130
medium / 768p	160−170	90−95
ultra / 1080p	85−90	35−40
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	120−130	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
ultra / 1080p	55−60	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	14−16	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	16−18	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	10−11
ultra / 1080p	16−18	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
low / 720p	90−95	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	5−6
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	45−50	18−20
medium / 1080p	24−27	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	75−80	45−50
medium / 768p	70−75	−
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	2−3
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	8−9	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	4−5
medium / 1080p	10−12	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	24−27	6−7
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	45−50	9−10
medium / 768p	30−33	8−9
high / 1080p	16−18	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro 2000D.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M10 8Q in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 2000D.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Quadro 2000D
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 May 2016	5 October 2011
Pipelines	640	192
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	625 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	20.00
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length	267 mm	178 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		31 Mh/s

GRID M10 8Q vs Quadro 2000D

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares